- From: Chris Haynes <chris@harvington.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 00:27:07 +0100
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
May I offer some thoughts as someone who designs interactive web services, and knows enough about color to know that he doesn't understand enough? I initially got quite excited by suggestions that we might define colors using expressions such as: border: thin dotted light dull shimmering cyan-blue; background: light vivid yellow-green; color: grimy rich magenta; but then I thought about how I actually use color. For the static description of color I'm quite content to use hex RGB values. I use a color swatch which gives me the RGB values, and the additional value of having words to describe a color is mimimal for me, in fact it is an extra step which I never take. All th color selection tools I have seen generated RGB values, so no value there. What would be useful for me would be the color equivalent of font-size: larger; which would modify a color defined elsewhere (maybe even in a style sheet I do not have access to). I'm thinking of something like: background-color: lighter; border-color: paler; color: redder; where the terms lighter, paler, redder are modifying an existing color in different (quasi-orthogonal?) ways. I'm sure that this would need a lot more work to get the color theory right, then to define the algorithm behind the modifiers so that all browsers would work in the same way, so is hardly a suitable proposal for a Last Call modification (unless this work has already been done somewhere else). So, as far as the CSS3 color module is concerned, I would be quite content for it to indicate the demise of named colors, in whatever standards-lingo is appropriate. Chris Haynes
Received on Sunday, 2 June 2002 19:31:21 UTC