- From: <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 05:26:49 -0400 (EDT)
- To: tantek@cs.stanford.edu, www-style@w3.org, www-svg@w3.org
- Cc: glazman@netscape.com
> From: Tantek Çelik [mailto:tantek@cs.stanford.edu] > > 1. If the X11 colors are already in common use, it's going > to make little > > difference whether they're formally included, omitted or deprecated: > > practical user agents are still going to have to support > them. The major > > difference would be whether validators flag them or not --- > I'd say it's > > better to let the validators distinguish "correct" color > names from errors > > than to lead authors to ignore all validator messages about > color names. > > Or even better to let validators distinguish between "correct", > "deprecated", and "incorrect" values for that matter. <grin/>See the recent posts on the tag archives on validators vs browsers. error recovery practices thread. No contest. Regards DaveP - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 14th June 2002 is RNIB Look Loud Day - visit http://www.lookloud.org.uk to find out all about it.
Received on Saturday, 1 June 2002 15:12:40 UTC