- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:07:27 +0200
- To: Jerry Baker <jerrybaker@attbi.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Jerry Baker wrote:
>
> Solutions
>
> There are two potential solutions that are both logical and reasonable:
>
> 1) Specifically exclude named anchors from :hover and :active states.
>
> 2) Require that an element be able to accept input from a pointing
> device before allowing it to have :hover and :active states.
3) Simply say:
:link:hover, :visited:hover
...instead of
a:hover
...as explained by David Baron:
http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~dbaron/css/1999/09/links
Cheers,
--
Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL
"meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2002 09:07:43 UTC