- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:07:27 +0200
- To: Jerry Baker <jerrybaker@attbi.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Jerry Baker wrote: > > Solutions > > There are two potential solutions that are both logical and reasonable: > > 1) Specifically exclude named anchors from :hover and :active states. > > 2) Require that an element be able to accept input from a pointing > device before allowing it to have :hover and :active states. 3) Simply say: :link:hover, :visited:hover ...instead of a:hover ...as explained by David Baron: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~dbaron/css/1999/09/links Cheers, -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL "meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2002 09:07:43 UTC