- From: Patrick Andries <pandries@iti.qc.ca>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 05:57:19 -0700
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Rowland Shaw" <Rowland.Shaw@crystaldecisions.com>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
----- Message d'origine -----
De: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
> Rowland Shaw wrote:
> >
> > I also happen to agree with Ian Hickson; XML is not really suited to CSS
as
> > it is today, due to it's non treelike structure.
> >
> > For the record, I'd refine his example to:
> > <rule>
> > <selector> <!-- I guess there's nothing to stop you using Xpath queries
> > instead -->
> > *:test > test:*
> > </selector>
> > <declaration>
> > <property>color</property>
> > <value>
> > <rgba red="25%" green="100%" blue="0%" alpha="0.5" />
> > </value>
> > </declaration>
> > </rule>
> > But I still prefer (if only for it's conciseness):
> > *|test > test|* { color: rgba( 25%, 100%, 0%, 0.5); }
>
> That still leaves the selector in its original CSS form,
What is wrong -- as it has been mentioned several times -- with XPath[-like]
selectors ?
>and the four rgba values still unparsed. It also dropped all the comments,
which is a big loss.
A smiley was obviously missing here. Comments are available in XML...
P. Andries
Received on Friday, 12 July 2002 08:58:23 UTC