- From: Rijk van Geijtenbeek <rijk@iname.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:55:34 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hello jonathan, On Friday, July 12, 2002 you wrote: > I think there may be a significant difference of meaning here, or perhaps > your comment did not relate so directly as I imagined to the subject, Re: > scale: font-size to % of client window? Indeed. Please read my original post clearly; it said "The other thing I miss", and then I explained somethign else I was missing, apart from font-sizes related to the screen width. > Rijk wrote > No. What has the width of the parent element to do with the number of > characters? > my conception was that the font-size for 'jack' would change so that it > always filled 15% of the width of the screen. That is currently not the case if you set 'width: 15%;' to an element, and no-one wants to change the current definition of 'width'! > so would a different 4 letters say 'meme' necessarily be in another > font-size? my guess is not, for a given font. > Are you concerned that the font-size be related to the client window size? That is the thing that is currently not possible. Greetings, Rijk mailto:rijk@iname.com Mot du Jour: Tis better to be hunter than hunted.
Received on Friday, 12 July 2002 05:54:22 UTC