- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:05:53 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org, Val Sharp <val@valsharp.co.uk>
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, 3:18:49 PM, Val wrote: VS> Ian Hickson, on 7/11/02 1:28 AM, wrote: VS> > Unfortunately, a common effect wanted by authors of slides is an VS> > animation. A simple property couldn't really provide for the wealth VS> > of animation effects used by authors. VS> Has author scripting gone out of fashion - because surely it could be VS> used to achieve the effect without too much difficulty? VS> Or is it the aim of CSS to take over basic dynamic effects on the VS> grounds that these are presentational? VS> OK, I know a lot of users have scripting turned off in their browsers VS> because of security fears, or because they're simply trying to avoid VS> tiresome animations, but I assume Dave was looking for something to VS> use for internal presentations. And these effects can be done already, without scripting, in already deployed viewers so re-inventing parts of SMIL in CSS seems like a waste of effort, really. Although of course, declarative animation can be mixed with scripting too and it all works together. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 10:06:23 UTC