- From: Patrick Andries <pandries@iti.qc.ca>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:17:48 -0700
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
- Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
----- Message d'origine ----- De: "Jan Roland Eriksson" <jrexon@newsguy.com> > CSS is a "non procedural, descriptive only" language, it shall stay that > way of course (advocating this to the current CSS WG, if it helps). I do not understand how this contradicts its syntax being XML. Could you explain ? > It's about understanding to use the right tool for the job at hand, the > "bandwagon" fools a lot of people to think in opposite ways. Yes, yes. I'm sure those "fooled by the bandwagon" appreciate. Let's stick to explaining why XML is incompatible with the « non procedural, descriptive only » nature of CSS. P. A. ---------------- Unicode en français (texte normatif, annotations, tous les caractères 3.2) http://hapax.iquebec.com
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2002 20:17:51 UTC