- From: Patrick Andries <pandries@iti.qc.ca>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:59:26 -0700
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, <www-style@w3.org>
----- Message d'origine ----- De: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch> > Patrick Andries wrote: > > I would like to do convert strict XHTML + CSS documents to some other > > format using XSLT. > > What other format? CGML (California Generic Markup Language, no joke : some legacy format) and FO, currently. > Is it a presentational format? Yes, in both cases. > I highly recommend using Perl with the XML::Parser and SAX::CSS > modules (or any of the numerous other XML and CSS modules). >Unless you > already know XSLT as well as some [1], then Perl is going to be a lot > easier for you. Sorry, I don't know Perl and know XSLT. > CSS is not a tree-like language, XML is not suitable for representing > the content of CSS. Could you explain this part ? This sounds interesting (fondamental). > Especially don't fall prey to the notion that because your tool (XSLT) > has limitations (only being able to handle XML), everything should fit > those limitations. Paraphrasing an old saying: "When all you have is a > hammer, you want everything to be a nail." It remains to be proven what has limitations (question above) : the syntax of CSS excluding it from processing by W3C standards or XSLT. P. A.
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2002 18:59:29 UTC