- From: Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:13:59 -0800
- To: Jesse McCarthy <mccarthy36@earthlink.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
From: Jesse McCarthy <mccarthy36@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: conformance (was layout solutions blah blah blah) Date: Fri, Jan 25, 2002, 5:56 AM > "Tantek Celik" <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> wrote on 1/24/02 11:16:29 PM: > >> >>IE5/Mac was >>released almost two years ago with fully conformant HTML4 and CSS1[1] >> .. >>So, I'd say that leaves the burden of proof in the naysayers' court. > > I guess your definition of full CSS 1 conformance somehow allows for a broken > @import implementation? Such remarks carry no substance without _at_a_minimum_ a URL to a valid example that _clearly_ demonstrates the statement. The same problem exists with simply hurling a statement like "such and such is not compliant". This is not comp.sys.browser.putdown. This is www-style. Please raise your standards. Thanks, Tantek
Received on Friday, 25 January 2002 11:09:22 UTC