- From: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:16:01 +0100
- To: Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, www-style@w3.org, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Vadim Plessky wrote:
>The fact that CSS3 Tables (and Positioning) modules are missing is pretty
>known. I think Bert was working on at least one of them, no?..
>Would be nice to have an update on that.
>
This world is full of surprises.
>To clarify my position once more: Tables is rather specific stuff, I would
>prefer not to use them at all.
>Now, do you see my point?
>
Yes, I see your point. I does not imply that I don't find it totally
crazy, but I see your point.
>Is it HTML or XML?
>
HTML.
>BTW: can you send me your example, please?
>
<html>
<head>
<title>test for www-style</title>
<style type="text/css">
div.t { display: table; width: 100%; border: 1px solid black}
div.r { display: table-row}
div.c { display: table-cell; border: 1px solid black}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="t">
<div class="r">
<div class="c">aaaa</div>
<div class="c">aaaa</div>
<div class="c">aaaa</div>
</div>
<div class="r">
<div class="c">aaaa</div>
<div class="c">aaaa</div>
<div class="c">aaaa</div>
</div>
<div class="r">
<div class="c">aaaa</div>
<div class="c">aaaa</div>
<div class="c">aaaa</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Pretty simple, working just fine.
</Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2002 04:15:37 UTC