- From: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 18:04:47 +0100
- To: Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, www-style@w3.org
Vadim Plessky wrote: >There is a CSS3, and there is no reason to implement *old* stuff when you can >go directly to a newer one. > Where ? Can you show us a REC ? Or at least a CR version of the Tables CSS 3 module ? >Theoretically, that's right. >But I did some research in that direction - and it shows that neither Mozilla >nor MS IE can render CSS2 'table-*' properties. Konqueror handles it much >better but still fails on some tetss. >Well, to be fare: MS never said that they support CSS2. >Can you explain Mozilla's position on this, please? > I can explain. And I can explain very easily : your test is just wrong. I have in front of me right now a table made with DIVs with the 'display' values needed for table, row and cell. Btw, there is only one "table-*" property and a little bit more "table-*" display values. >Well, than we face more fundamental question: wether HTML should be used?.. > Ah, if we now reach religious matters and studies about the existence of parallel worlds, I am off to bed. </Daniel> -- Daniel Glazman Composer & CSS Engine Netscape Communications Corp. glazman@netscape.com http://people.netscape.com/glazman AIM:glazou2000 IRC:glazou The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing - Jim Barksdale
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2002 12:04:29 UTC