- From: Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 18:08:06 +0000
- To: "Robert Koberg" <rob@koberg.com>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 14:51, Robert Koberg wrote: | Hi, | | I have been following this thread with great interest. I want to Believe. | A few months ago I had took a contract to setup a website. One of my | responsibilities was to create the XSLT templates for transformation from | XML to HTML (using CSS too). I am curious how you would handle the | situation where the design DEMANDs tables to lay out properly. Can you use | CSS (1, 2 or 3) to lay out this site: | http://teenlearningnetwork.com/ - should work in all 4th gen plus | browsers, cross-platform 4th generation browsers are indeed a problem. But you still can use CSS in ver.4 browsers! | | There are several things wrong with this site and I argued them to the | producers and designers (flash, nested tables, fixed width, etc). They | make the decisions. I have to follow orders. Do you suggest we should just | Say No to these things and wait for a job where the designer will design | things properly? well, if you do web design for fun - you should Say Goodbuy to htis client. If you work for money - you need to follow. I found (personal opinion) that it's better to get money in some business, sometimes not related to IT or Web at all, and to re-invest those money in your hobby and volunteer work. I hardly believe that I could buy a car I drive nowdays if I was doing web design :-) | | Is this group mostly theoretical? I would say that www-style is less teoretical than www-dom and more teoretical than www-html. Everything is *relative* in this world :-) But indeed primary focus of ww-style ML is to discuss W3C CSS specs, not day-to-day design issues. Hopefully we do not ignore those issues and discuss them too. | | best, | -Rob | -- Vadim Plessky http://kde2.newmail.ru (English) 33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html KDE mini-Themes http://kde2.newmail.ru/themes/
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 10:08:00 UTC