- From: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:54:54 -0600
- To: Mikko Rantalainen <mira@cc.jyu.fi>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Apologies for 2nd reply to same msg, but wanted to add: >>> In my last response, I stated that I think sentence parsers are better way >>> to go. And that I bet parsers exist, even I don't have time to research >>them. >> >>Sentence parsers sound great, but I'm afraid we aren't seeing any of >>those in any browser in next N+2 years. Probably never, if the only >>reason to have them is to have slight improvement in rendering. In >>addition, such a parser should be able to decipher incorrect grammar and >>typing mistakes to be usable in normal web pages. > >Grammar correction and other uses of sentence parsers (such as natural > inflection text-to-speech) sounds like a great idea for a way to incentivize > their inclusion in user agents. ...and sentence parsers is a base algorithm for translators, so the other 74% can read the other 64% of pages in their native language!! :-) -Shelby Moore
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 22:54:16 UTC