- From: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 04:18:08 EDT
- To: howcome@opera.com, www-tag@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <22.2d73fcf4.2a935540@aol.com>
In a message dated 20/08/2002 08:29:23 GMT Daylight Time, howcome@opera.com writes: > > All HTML tells you is that something is a paragraph, a level 1 > > heading, a table, monospaced, preformatted, and a few other things. > > <SINGER>Madonna</SINGER> is more semantic than <SPAN>Madonna</SPAN>. > > You can combine the two: > > <span class="singer">Madonna</span> > > which preserves your semantic, while still using HTML and staying > compatible with hundreds of millions of browsers. Using the CLASS > attribute you can tranform any XML markup into HTML without losing > information. > Hakon, This, I humbly suggest, is a recipe for disaster. Do you suggest we create a namespace mechanism (or something functionally equivalent) for the value of a class attribute? How else are we to disambiguate, <span class="title">Queen Elizabeth</span> from <span class="title">School janitor</span> from <span class="title">SVG Unleashed</span> in a narrative along the (contrived) lines of "Queen Elizabeth visited the school and the school janitor showed her a copy of SVG Unleashed in the school library"? How do you suggest we capture structural/contextual semantic information within a class attribute? This all seems too class-y for my taste. :) Regards Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 04:19:12 UTC