- From: Jan Roland Eriksson <jrexon@newsguy.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 23:12:22 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Cc: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, Svgdeveloper@aol.com
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 11:40:20 -0700, Tantek wrote: [... fup's adjusted ...] >"information SHOULD be stored _and_ delivered with > markup that is as semantically rich as achievable." Sure; it would be really "hefty" if we could do that. But, sorry to say, there is nothing available from W3C that lets that happen; (not that I had expected that in the first place) >And provide a scale of the relative semantic richness of various formats, >something like: > > Semantic richness of various content formats > (diagram not to scale) > > MOST.......................................LEAST > MathML (X)HTML SVG XSLFO XML PNG What is it that makes that list of "dummies" usable in a www context when noting in their specs refers to their NOTATIONS in a usable way ? >Though others have provided much more detail and description on this topic. >See various WAI documents and independent papers [1]. We don't need to; Judy is running her own show over there... <http://www.w3.org/WAI/> Look at the bottom of the page... -- Rex
Received on Monday, 19 August 2002 17:14:25 UTC