- From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:33:22 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, www-style@w3.org, www-dom@w3.org, w3c-xml-linking-ig@w3.org
- CC: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, Ronald Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>, Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>, Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
hello. i have just published a report describing a proposal for an xlink data model. it is available at http://dret.net/netdret/docs/tikrep148.pdf and proposes to define a data model for xlink based on the xml infoset. the report's abstract reads: "This report describes a proposal for a data model for XLink. It defines the data model as contributions of XLink to the XML Infoset. The data model is meant as a clarification of the link model implicitly defined by XLink. It is also meant as the foundation for future work on XLink, for example a DOM module for XLink support, a CSS module for styling XLinks, or a protocol for accessing XLink linkbases." my goal is to have this (or an improved ;-) version of the xlink infoset being specified as a w3c recommendation, so that other activities (such as dom and css) can build on top of it. possible developments are: - an xlink dom3 module - css3 selectors for linking information - css3 properties for link formatting - xsl-fo properties for link styling - a protocol for linkbase access in my opinion, all these things should be done to promote xlink and to help to make the xml-based web a hypermedia systems, where things can be easily linked. if there is enough support, then i hope that w3c will start to define an xlink infoset. i am very curious to hear what people think of this idea. i know that xlink is not everybody's darling, and that xlink's success so far has been less than stellar, but i hope that we cann still change this by providing users with a better framework for working with xlink. kind regards, erik wilde - tel:+41-1-6325132 - fax:+41-1-6321035 mailto:net.dret@dret.net - http://dret.net/ computer engineering and networks laboratory swiss federal institute of technology (eth) * try not. do, or do not. there is no try. *
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2002 12:18:46 UTC