Re: Progress of css3-userint?

Andrew Clover wrote:
> I have serious reservations about this spec as it stands (mainly: sections
> 5.2 - 5.4, which don't belong in a styling language IMO), and I'd like
> to know if there have been any shift in thinking since then.

As the editor of the "Advanced UI" spec (aka "UI2"), I am curious as to where 
you believe such properties actually belong. The Mozilla team has found that CSS 
is in fact an ideal place for such properties. Could you explain what 
alternative ideas you have?

Ian Hickson
``The inability of a user agent to implement part of this specification due to
the limitations of a particular device (e.g., non interactive user agents will
probably not implement dynamic pseudo-classes because they make no sense
without interactivity) does not imply non-conformance.'' -- Selectors, Sec13

Received on Saturday, 6 April 2002 12:17:50 UTC