- From: Tapio Markula <tapio1@gamma.nic.fi>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 03:49:21 -0500 (EST)
- To: bbos@w3.org, peter@linss.com, www-style@w3.org, "Haavard K. Moen" <hkmoen@opera.com>, <dbaron@fas.harvard.edu>, sean@mysterylights.com
Hi Forms I have examined forms and I have certain matters different opinion. See http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/Teaching/Taustat.php3#Forms Width CSS3 offers two formulas to calculate the width property. This cause also one problem with the relation to the width attribute. How CSS3-supporting browsers should behave in the following situation? <table width="100" style="box-sizing:content-box" border=10"> 1) Because CSS doesn't define the width value, the formula of the width-attribute is followed and the content width is 100-(2x10)= 80 pixel. 2) CSS should alter the calculation formula of the width-attribute, when the content width is 100 pixel? Should the CSS3 specification define this relation? --------------------------------------------------------- Tapio Markula, tapio.markula@nic.fi, tapio1@nic.fi http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/index.html (Finnish) http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/index_e.html (English) --------------------------------------------------------- I like __ ¦__¦__ Cascading ¦__¦__¦__ Style ¦__¦__¦__¦ Sheets http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/Opetus/FAQ.php3 http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/Teaching/FAQ.php3 --------------------------------------------------------- I have made something also with XML and XSL: http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/Opetus/XSL-new.php3 (XML) http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/Teahing/XSL-new.php3 (XML) ---------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 16:42:36 UTC