- From: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 00:12:13 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
Jonas Sicking wrote: > > I propose the following synax instead > :nth-child(an+b to c) > That would allow the following selectors > > :nth-child(2n+1) /* every odd child */ > :nth-child(4n) /* every fourth child child */ > :nth-child(5n+2 to 3) /* child number 2,3,7,8,12,13.... */ > :nth-child(10 to 20) /* child 10,11...20 */ > :nth-child(5n+0 to 4) /* selects every child */ > :nth-child(2n+3) /* every odd child */ I like this. As has been mentioned before, this functionality is very useful for e.g. grouping table rows in sets of five. You could also have the syntax like this - :nth-child(an + b..c) but that's just cosmetics. > where a, b and c must be positive or zero I don't think that's necessary. b < c should suffice. But if you're disallowing the negative a, then IMO, you should allow them and get rid of :nth-last-child instead. ;-)
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2001 00:11:06 UTC