- From: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 09:40:51 -0800
- To: webmaster@richinstyle.com
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2000 12:40:19 UTC
Matthew Brealey wrote: > You wrote: > >> In the CSS2 spec. there is a style sheet to represent the default behaviour >> (i.e. style) that most browsers apply to HTML. However, there is the caveat >> that certain things like the display of images in <img> cannot be expressed. >> While this is not quite legal, has anyone considered the following:- >> >> @media screen { img { content: url(attr(src)); } } > > > Yes they have. > > img {content: url()} is almost certain to be valid CSS3, and attr is proposed. > -- Random fortune > Hear about the Californian terrorist that tried to blow up a bus? > Burned his lips on the exhaust pipe. Almost certain ?... Voyez-vous cela... Is there _any_ good reason why I receive FIVE copies of your message with a different 'fortune' at the bottom each time (and that implies it's not a mail exploder's bug) ? </Daniel>
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2000 12:40:19 UTC