- From: Manos M. Batsis <manosb@profile.gr>
- Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 15:24:06 +0200
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
What if we send the link through the http header while also having the usual <link> in the (X)html source. If the user agent is able to understand the Link header field, will it try to pull it again from the server when it reads the <link> or will it use the one in the cache? I don't think we are getting out of the subject of the list with this thread. After all, speed is a serious factor in every internet application and one of the reasons many of us learned to use stylesheets ;-) Manos -----Original Message----- From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Ian Hickson Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 10:28 PM To: Chris Croome Cc: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: <link> vs <style></style> On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Chris Croome wrote: > Agreed, and an answer to this is to have the external style sheet > address in the HTTP headers, so the request for the css file can be sent > after the headers of the html file have been returned: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/present/styles.html#h-14.6 > > However I've not come across sites using this, is it supported in any > browsers? Mozilla supports it in the http-equiv <meta> headers, but due to bug 3248, real HTTP 'Link' headers don't make it far enough in the code to be taken into account. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3248 So I guess the answer is "almost", which is as useful as "no". ;-) -- Ian Hickson )\ _. - ._.) fL Netscape, Standards Compliance QA /. `- ' ( `--' +1 650 937 6593 `- , ) - > ) \ irc.mozilla.org:Hixie _________________________ (.' \) (.' -' __________
Received on Sunday, 17 December 2000 08:26:00 UTC