- From: Matthew Brealey <webmaster@richinstyle.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 18:34:51 +0100
- To: Daniel Glazman <glazou_2000@yahoo.fr>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Daniel Glazman wrote: > > --- Matthew Brealey <webmaster@richinstyle.com> a écrit : > > > BeCSS is a proposal to turn style sheets into a script dump. > > Matthew, I wonder how can you seriously write this comment in > this mailing-list. Please don't take it personally. But perhaps I should have listened more carefully when I was taught to use language precisely: BeCSS is a proposal to use style sheets as a script dump. > Even if it is a surprise for you, people in the css+fp wg always > think about security issues. Somewhat, since CSS by definition (as was) doesn't have any security issues. But I'm not really concerned about security as much as a fundamental issue with CSS > Some people even disagree with BECSS !-) Surely not ;-) > BECSS does not turn CSS in a script dump. Try to see it as a new > thing, that uses exactly the CSS grammar and format, and that > deals only with behaviours. Hmm. SVG does that, but that doesn't follow the dump approach. > BECSS is a proposal that tries to address a problem that dozens and > dozens of people expressed during the Future of HTML Workshop, some > years ago : the componentization of the Web. Indeed, and two submissions, action style sheets, and HTC do this, without all the issues that BeCSS has. > BECSS is *a* possible > solution, maybe not *the* solution. > If you think that something can be saved from the current draft, say > it. I don't think people object to the reuse of CSS syntax; there is also consensus, AFAIA, that componentisation is acceptable. > In the real world, the best solution is not always the purest. Adopting the expedient 'solution' has proved time and again to cost billions in the long run - witness this in operating systems, in security problems across the board, and indeed on the web. No-one would argue that <font> was ever a good thing, but it was certainly expedient - the cost of this is still being counted now ($millions? $billions). I don't think anyone ever regretted doing things properly. And it's the least one would expect from a standards organisation, if not necessarily from a commercial company. ----------------------------------- Please visit http://RichInStyle.com. Featuring: MySite: customizable styles. AlwaysWork style Browser bug table covering all CSS2 with links to descriptions. Lists of > 1000 browser bugs Websafe Colorizer CSS2, CSS1 and HTML4 tutorials. CSS masterclass CSS2 test suite: 5000++ tests and 300+ test pages.
Received on Tuesday, 8 August 2000 13:29:02 UTC