- From: Dmitry Beransky <dberansky@ucsd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 08:26:51 -0700
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
Following the sentiment, another, in my opinion, useful set of selectors
would be :secure and :encrypted - for links going through encrypted and
secure channels. However, there needs to be a way to distinguished between
potentially secure channels and strongly secure. For example,
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/flex-sign-in-done/104-0662680-3423623
may potentially be secure, because it will be invoked via a secure
protocol, but once followed, it may turn out not to be secure due to some
problem with the certificate. However, regardless of the certificate
problems, this link will still be encrypted due to the nature of the
protocol (what bugs me about current browsers, is that they don't
distinguish between encrypted and authenticated connections).
Cheers
Dmitry
At 07:38 AM 4/14/00, David Wagner wrote:
>I would like to propose a collection of pseudo-classes for
>consideration. These pseudo-classes all relate to styling links and
>improve document collection accessibility. They apply only to
>documents and to elements which accept user input.
Received on Monday, 17 April 2000 11:21:45 UTC