- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@libertysurf.fr>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 08:31:25 +0200
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: daniel.glazman@polytechnique.org, webmaster@richinstyle.com, www-html@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
Dan Connolly a écrit : > But examining the formalities... that is a paragraph with exactly > one word in it. The HTML definition of a word is not impacted > by stylesheets: > > "For all HTML elements except PRE, sequences of white space separate > "words" (we use the term "word" here to mean "sequences of non-white > space characters"). When formatting text, user agents should identify > these words and lay them out according to the > conventions of the particular written language (script) and > target medium." > -- > http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/struct/text.html#h-9.1 Just FYI and information of the other readers : one of my best friends is a latinist. He had to put on an intranet some weeks ago the exact copy of a romanian wall inscription where words are separated by a colon. Not by whitespaces. It means that the common formatting algos in browsers don't work and he *has* to insert whitespaces in that quotation. It also means that a copy/paste of the quotation is incorrect. I told him that some useful whitespaces are not so important ; he became red and explained me during ten minutes that the original text has no space and Science (with a big S) needs to show/print the text as it stands on the romanian wall. I have raised this issue some time ago. Sometimes, document providers need to specify, on a per-element basis, which char should be interpretated as a word separator. > Bit I'd like to discourage authors from relying on <p><p><p> > to skootch their text down a little bit. Yes, of course. But that's not enough ; they still can write <br><br><br>, which is IMHO ugly too... </Daniel>
Received on Friday, 14 April 2000 06:07:29 UTC