- From: Joe Hewitt <joe@joehewitt.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 23:52:08 -0400
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
Yes... it would change "on the fly". One other thing to note - there needs to be a directive in CSS by which you can prevent word-wrapping. In addition to directing an element to "shrink" to the size of it's content, you would also tell it not to word-wrap. > Sounds okay, but will this be something which changes on the fly? > Or can be reapplied? > Say you have a scripted form field (a good example is a clock...) > whose content can change length, how is this handled? > > Why not have width: inside or something then? > auto sizes to fill to the parent block right? > This new type would fill to current content length... > Upon which one may specify bounds with min-width and max-width ? > > -- > * > __ * . > \ | / . . . . . ((_ > _____ . > . . > -- / \ -- . . . + . . _/\ > oooooooooo. | * . . . * > / ;M\_ . > .oooooooooooo.oo. . . . . /\ . > / :IMM\ > ..oooooooooooo..oo. Jerrad Pierce /\ / \ > / ;IIWMM > ..oooooooooo....... 209 North Street + / \ / \ . > / ;IIIIWM > ...ooooooooo....... Randolph, MA 02368 / \ \ > ___/ :;IIIIIWM > ....ooo....o....... / \ \ / > :: ;;IIIMI > .....ooo......... http://www.pthbb.org / \ \ : > :::;IIIM > ..ooooooo.... __________________________ || || > ::.....:::::: > MOTD on Prickle-Prickle, the 21st of Discord, in the YOLD 3166: > > Hey, go buy a plane ticket to another state of mind, okay? > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2000 23:52:43 UTC