- From: Sjoerd Visscher <sjoerd@heeten.nl>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 23:09:54 +0200
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
Hello, I have some points to consider about the User Interface for CSS3 Workin Draft: System colors: Why are there no DefaultButton and DefaultButtonText systemcolors? I see no reason to make an exception here. I myself have been using a slighlty lighter background and text color for the default buttons in my web applications, it gives the interface more elegance. It's also much easier and nicer to implement. It gives: [<empty>|enabled|disabled|active|hover] x [the 14 UI elements] x [<empty>|Text|Border] (5x14x3=210) The 'key-equivalent' property: It would be very usefull for the 'key-equivalent' property if you would define default system key equivalents. Example: INPUT.ok { key-equivalent: return enter Y } I am Dutch speaking, so I would expect an J for Ja instead of a Y for Yes. So INPUT.ok { key-equivalent: systemOK } would be a more general solution. I also do not know what the expected macintosh keys are. With default system key equivalents, I don't have to know them. the 'user-select' property: toggle and all are effectively the same: If one selects something with user-select set to all, everything will be selected. If the user then selects it again, everything will be deselected again. So this is completely the same as toggle. The only difference is the expected look, which is set through all the different kinds of other CSS properties. the 'user-focus' property: Are all combinations of the 'user-focus' property and the 'user-select' property possible? (there sure are a lot of combinations that make sense, most of the user-focus values seem to apply only on the user-select:text property) I must say this proposal makes a very nice combination with the new XHTML form ideas. It would be even nicer if eventually every (XML) element could be made input-enabled on the fly. (makes it very easy to write an editor) Sjoerd Visscher Locosoft bv
Received on Friday, 17 September 1999 17:12:07 UTC