- From: Ian Hickson <py8ieh@bath.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:15:17 +0100 (BST)
- To: Rasmus Kaj <kaj@raditex.se>
- cc: springer@netrax.net, www-style@w3.org
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Rasmus Kaj wrote: > I tought I remembered seeing this on the list before, but I failed to > find it on Ian Hickson's list [2]. Hmm. I have quite a few things still to add to the list... (Not likely to happen before september, either. Sorry people...) > It seems to me this is related to the 'position' property, an element > with position: static should probably not be rotatable (just like > 'left' and 'top' don't apply to static elements), so it should > probably go into what is section 0.3.2 in CSS2, "Box offsets: 'top', > 'right', 'bottom', 'left'", something like this: > > 'rotate' > > Value: <angle> | auto | inherit > Initial: auto > Applies to: all elements (with position other than static) > Inherited: no > Percentages: N/A > Media: visual > > This property specifies how a box's content is rotated from the > content of the box's containing block. > > Naturally, there should also be examples of this, and what is now > section 4.3.7, Angles [3], should also be updated to note that angles > apply visually as well as aurally. Sounds like a very good idea. -- Ian Hickson : Is your JavaScript ready for Nav5 and IE5? : Get the latest JavaScript client sniffer at : http://developer.netscape.com/docs/examples/javascript/browser_type.html
Received on Monday, 28 June 1999 19:15:24 UTC