- From: Bert Bos <Bert.Bos@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 15:10:44 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
Sue Sims writes: > From: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS1#anchor-pseudo-classes > "Note that normal class names precede pseudo-classes in the selector. " > > From: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/selector.html#pseudo-classes > "Pseudo-classes are allowed anywhere in selectors ... " > > If this is intended as a change, should it not be included in: > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/changes.html Yes, I think this was intended as a change. All the changes to the selectors are summarized in one line in appendix B1: "An extended selector mechanism, including child selectors, adjacent selectors, and attribute selectors." Maybe the relaxation of the syntax of class selectors (more than one is now allowed) and pseudo-classes could have been made explicit. > > If an error in CSS1, should it not be included in the ersatz errata: > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS1#appendix-f No, it's not an error in CSS1. The syntax was restricted on purpose, to make implementations easier and to gain some experience. Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos/ W3C/INRIA bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 1999 09:10:50 UTC