- From: Sjoerd Visscher <gerviss@wxs.nl>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 15:01:57 +0100
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
I'm sorry if I shocked some off the CSS fans. This is why I think CSS should be history in a few years: CSS IS NOT XML Problems with CSS not being XML: - extension is more limited - authors need to learn a second (programming) language - future optimized soft- and hardware may only be able to read XML. The ideal internet would be an XML-only internet. - A separate DOM has to be defined. Using XML would not require this. I'm reading this mailinglist for a while now and a lot of discussion is going on about how new features should be implemented into the CSS language. XML usually makes extending much easier. The need for extending CSS has required the use of almost al characters on a keyboard, i.e. () {} [] ' " @ ; : and ! (I'm sure that's not all of them). This will get more and more confusing. There are 2 solutions: 1. Switch to XSL 2. Converting CSS to XML, this should not be to hard. We could call it NG-CSS. Please respond. Sjoerd Visscher - sjoerd@locosoft.nl Locosoft bv - www.locosoft.nl
Received on Saturday, 9 January 1999 09:02:41 UTC