Re: New WD: CSS3 selectors

In article <>,
Garth Wallace <> writes

[rearranged according to usual custom]

>> >    CSS3 module: W3C selectors 
>> >
>> The new draft uses a lot of blah-de-blah pseudo classes and suchlike.
>> Today I also had a glance at the new SMIL draft, which specifically
>> talks about replacing such things with a blahDeBlah kind of arrangement.
>> Wouldn't it be better to be consistent across all the various
>> technologies?

>Why? That's like saying that Lisp should conform to C syntax.

Well perhaps that should be taken as a comment on the changes to the
SMIL syntax, rather than my plea for consistency.

George Lund

Received on Sunday, 8 August 1999 13:03:06 UTC