- From: Daniel Glazman <Daniel.Glazman@der.edf.fr>
- Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 10:20:55 +0200
- To: George Lund <George@lundboox.demon.co.uk>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
George Lund wrote: > The new draft uses a lot of blah-de-blah pseudo classes and suchlike. > Today I also had a glance at the new SMIL draft, which specifically > talks about replacing such things with a blahDeBlah kind of arrangement. > Wouldn't it be better to be consistent across all the various > technologies? > > If that makes any sense at all. Well... Will such a decision remove the tons of existing stylesheets with existing foo-of-bar pseudos ? Clearly no. Browser vendors will have to support both writings. Furthermore, I think that not-first-child is much more user readable than notfirstchild. I also believe that is is much more readable for people who are not native english speakers. My personal opinion of course, not WG's. </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 5 August 1999 04:21:12 UTC