- From: Sue Sims <sue@css.nu>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 12:35:39 GMT
- To: "w3c style" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, 30 Nov 1998 11:33:15 -0000, you wrote: >... I think it would be >rather fun to implement a new emphasis tag. I see this often, and I use it >myself. It is the <rant> tag. I'm sure you must agree, it would have many and >varied uses, and would spread light and joy throughout the web community. >Very frivolous, but sometimes these things can prove useful. At the moment I >just do a p.rant and assign the style as a class. A dedicated tag would be >rather handy though... A "dedicated" tag is not required. My .rant class lives in my CSS file, where it should. I might be interested in some sort of standardization on commonly used class names (.note, .warning, .rant et.al.). I think Todd posted some at one time, but I can't locate them. I looked at the Dublin Core recently, but couldn't find them there, either. I did locate, from Todd's base.css, the following: /* Suggested class names .advert .antithesis .callout .colophon .conclusion .credit .detail .excursus .offsite .hilite .initial .irony .key .legal .marginalia .nav .note .opposition .proposal .rant .remark .subhead .successive .summary .synthesis .teaser .thesis .title .warn */ Is there/should there be any effort to standardize on these? -- Sue Sims mailto:sue@css.nu http://css.nu/
Received on Monday, 30 November 1998 07:36:25 UTC