- From: Steve Knoblock <knoblock@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 00:07:19 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
What about scripting? The distinction might be relevant to this kind of "effects oriented" (dynamic) authoring. It seems that currently a script requires a unique name for each element to manipulate it, therefore id is increasingly used for programmatic reference while class is used to apply a style to the same items. Like <div id=p1 class=menuitem>Item 1</div> <div id=p2 class=menuitem>Item 2</div> <div id=p3 class=menuitem>Item 3</div> Now, you could use a unique class name, but it seems Netscape is not friendly to this. Unless I'm seeing things... You're right, it's good markup anyway. Separate styles/scripts applied to a particular element from a style applied to all instances of the same class. I guess it's possible to apply a script to all elements of the same class, such as elementTOC.expandToc() (fictional code) to expand the whole table of contents. Steve >instance of something as belonging to a class of things." From an >effect-oriented CSS author's point of view, the distinction may be >irrelevant, but from a markup point of view, it's a question of integrity. _/ Steve Knoblock mailto:editor@city-gallery.com _/ City Gallery http://www.city-gallery.com/ _/ Member NSA http://www.3d-web.com/nsa/nsa.htm
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 1998 00:07:59 UTC