- From: Todd Fahrner <fahrner@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 17:09:00 -0700
- To: Simon Daniels <simonda@microsoft.com>, www-style@w3.org
- Cc: www-font@w3.org
Simon Daniels wrote (2:35 PM -0700 5/11/98): " The point at which antialiasing is switched on and off by Windows is decided " by the type designer. ...for the relatively *very few* typefaces whose designers are alive and have been actively engaged with the realization of their faces as TrueType. For the rest it's ... something else. " They set values in the font's GASP table in ppem sizes " (pixel per em) not points. I am very glad to learn this, thank you. I found the Win95 font information widget misleading in that it reported point ranges at which these policies applied. So if I change my logical resolution, it will report different point ranges? " There seem to be two camps when it comes to antialiasing. On one side there " was the Legibility is Everything Brigade (favoring the gridfit + hint + " antialias approach) and the Wysiwyg is King Crew (throw the hints away and " antialias). It would be nice if future operating systems/CSS let the " user/designer choose between these two approaches. Agreed. I have yet to see any credible scientific evidence to support the thesis that non-anti-aliased type is more legible than anti-aliased, though legibility may indeed be the flag that flies over that camp. " If you like you prefer fluffy type, antialiased at all sizes, you can run " your fonts through a little tool that sets the GASP to smooth at all sizes - " http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lakes/8162/. The resulting font could " be embedded. Mmmmm fluf-fy. <g> Thanks! Todd Fahrner mailto:todd@lowbrow.com http://www.verso.com/agitprop/ The printed page transcends space and time. The printed page, the infinitude of books, must be transcended. THE ELECTRO-LIBRARY. - El Lissitzky, 1923
Received on Monday, 11 May 1998 20:00:59 UTC