- From: Todd Fahrner <fahrner@pobox.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 11:39:49 -0700
- To: "David Perrell" <davidp@earthlink.net>, <www-style@w3.org>
At 11:05 AM -0700 6/3/1997, David Perrell wrote: > I think you've fallen into a serious shortcoming of the list-item > display type. The list-style-position property only accepts the keyword > values "outside" and "inside". Why not length and percentage (of > element width)? This addition would give you what you want. > > But I'd still think "list-item" an unnecessary > HTML-compatibility-kludge. The recommendation's ascii-diagrams suggest, however, that lists are formatted by a combination of margin, padding, and border values on list container and item elements. It looks like I should be able to do what I'm after without the extensions you discuss, though perhaps without fine control of the position of the list-item marker. > There has been discussion here about adding :before and :after > pseudo-elements to CSS. IMO, we also need a 'block-indent' text > property. I'm all for before/after rules, but again it seems to me that between margin, border, and padding, block indents should be well-provisioned. If I am correct, it's clear that the 4.0 betas don't implement proper support for these yet. Your extensions seem straightforwardly useful, but unless they're essential to doing anything reasonable with lists, I'd prefer to beat my drum first for a full implementation of the existing spec. __________________ Todd Fahrner mailto:fahrner@pobox.com http://www.verso.com/
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 1997 14:41:16 UTC