- From: Todd Fahrner <fahrner@pobox.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 17:24:23 -0700
- To: neil@bigpic.com, www-style@w3.org
At 5:52 PM -0600 7/22/97, Neil St.Laurent wrote: >Does the line-height attribute actually affect the vertical size of >the font? No, it adds or subtracts from the font's "native" line-height, which is equivalent to its size. >If not, does the font-size refer to the vertical size and >the width is chosen based on the glyph definition? If by vertical size you mean "unaltered line height" - yes. Widths are glyph-specific. If the actual width of an M is 1em, it's an accident. >Everything appears to just refer to font-size, except for the >shorthand "font" which has line-height grouped in, which makes we >wonder if it affects the font size at all. Not sure what you mean by "line-height grouped in". In a 12-point font, the actual distance from the top of the ascenders to the bottom of the descenders is typically a bit less than 12-point, in order to keep these from touching on contiguous lines when set without extra line height (leading). ________________________________________ Todd Fahrner mailto:fahrner@pobox.com http://www.verso.com/ The printed page transcends space and time. The printed page, the infinitude of books, must be transcended. THE ELECTRO-LIBRARY. --El Lissitzky, 1923
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 1997 20:13:48 UTC