- From: Polar Partner <polarpar@sn.no>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 08:03:50 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: "Chris Wilson (PSD)" <cwilso@microsoft.com>
- cc: "'Lee Daniel Crocker'" <lee@piclab.com>, walter@natural-innovations.com, www-html@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
Sorry, but I can't understand why you sent ME this answer? On Thu, 17 Jul 1997, Chris Wilson (PSD) wrote: > Actually, the point of the BUTTON tag is to allow rich content (e.g., > images and marked-up text) in a button - which INPUT is incapable of, > since it is not a container. > > -Chris > Chris Wilson > cwilso@microsoft.com > *** > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lee Daniel Crocker [SMTP:lcrocker@calweb.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 1997 11:11 PM > > To: walter@natural-innovations.com > > Cc: www-html@w3.org; www-style@w3.org > > Subject: Re: BUTTON element > > > > > OK, here's another idea. I use a RAD environment on the Macintosh > > called > > > FaceSpan [1], which has a pictbox property called 'selection style'. > > The > > > property values are as follows: > > > > > > none pictbox or cell does not highlight > > > by hilite white areas of pictbox or cell are overlain > > > with the System highlight color (from the > > > Color control panel) > > > by invert colors of pictbox or cell are inverted > > > by lasso colors of pictbox or cell are inverted > > within > > > contours that exclude the pictbox's fill > > color > > > by frame pictbox or cell is surrounded by a frame > > > by sink pictbox or cell is surrounded by a column of > > > pixels on the left and one row of pixels on > > > the top > > > by exchange a different artwork resource is used for the > > > highlighted pictbox > > > > > > So, how about assigning a selection-style to the <INPUT> element? > > > Something like: { selection-style: invert } > > > > > > Perhaps selection-style values of: > > > hilite | dim | invert | sink | exchange > > > > > > although I'm not sure how exchange would interact with PRESSED > > attribute. > > > 'dim' would simply darken the colors: FF->99, CC->66, 99->33, > > 66/33/00->00. > > > > Much, much, better than that hideous, incompatible BUTTON tag. If one > > absolutely /has/ to break compatibility for a feature, that's fine, > > but > > this is not anywhere near such a case: <INPUT> works just fine, and > > its > > display attributes belong in a style sheet--even the X,Y argument is > > uncompelling, because they can be ignored easily. > >
Received on Friday, 18 July 1997 02:04:08 UTC