- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- Date: 19 Jan 1997 21:56:13 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-style@www10.w3.org, www-html@www10.w3.org
Dave Raggett wrote: I think there is a good case for markup to indicate how to speak certain words or phrases, when this also serves to amplify the semantics. I couldn't agree more. The WebSpeak browser does a good job on interpreting the semantics implied by Hn, OL/UL/DL --> LI/DT/DD, EM, STRONG etc. <acronym for="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</acronym> <abbrev for="etcetera">etc.</abbrev> <person fullname="David St.John Raggett">Dave</person> I like the attributes. The current HTML Pro just uses the HTML3 set, which I think we expected to use ID/IDREF mechanisms for this, but your suggestion is much clearer. If a name is from a different language then different pronunciation rules will apply, this can be handled via the language attribute, e.g. <person lang=fr>Jean François Dupont</person> Imagine the script for a Pink Panther (movie not toon) in HTML being spoken using this :-) For really hard to pronounce phrases, perhaps its worth considering an attribute for specifying the pronunciation using the International Phonetic Alphabet. Can anyone give me a lead on how to represent IPC characters conveniently using ASCII? Is there an agreed set of SGML entities? Yes I think there is, but I don't think it is possible to represent the chars using ASCII very easily (although maybe the IPC people do this in email somehow). There is certainly a recognised name for each character (I think the ipamacs.sty file in the wsuipa font collection for TeX implements the glyphs by name). It would be great to collect suggestions for enlarging the set of phrase tags for future versions of HTML. Is there a core set that will meet say 95% of people's needs? The TEI pretty much defined most things you could want to do with content markup at the basic level. Maybe someone on TEI-L could suggest a core set for the level of use you describe. ///Peter
Received on Sunday, 19 January 1997 17:55:20 UTC