- From: Space Cowboy <spacecow@mis.net>
- Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 16:01:26 -0500
- To: Chris Lilley <Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <348325A6.D30EEAC4@mis.net>
Chris Lilley wrote: > LAB can show all colors that any RGB or CMYK or hexachrome can. That's what I said (L*A*B color is supposed to show every shade color you can think of.) > all visible colors, by definition above. > whose screen? Do you have the same make of monitor I do? Both of our monitors are constrained by the limitations of CRTs (of course, Neil was right, I didn't think of plasma or LCD screens that can display more colors). At the least, you can display from 0-255 red, 0-255 green, 0-255 blue, and I'm not going to try to fix your gamma and color curve for you. That's something we are always going to have to deal with. > Certainly CSS is good for screen layout, and certainly CSS2 adds some > features that are needed for printing. Go look at the CSS2 spec, the ack That's a conversion. It's not a straight line either way. How big's a pixel again? ;-) > Not at all. Adding colors that some screens can display while others > can't is fine, particularly if your monitor has a wider gamut than the > next guys. And, it isn't a screen standard. If a company logo happens > to contain colors that can't be represented on a particular screen, it > still makes sense to be able to say what the color should be - and you > may get a closer match when you print. I stand corrected. I guess we should go all out and do the L*A*B if where trying to get the color match, eh? > Both are machine readable. Yes, lots of conversions would be bad. Yes, > HLS does not represent any colors RGB cannot. And yes, the conversion > from HLS to RGB is like 10 lines of code. 10 lines in what language? I must write terrible code! > You do *not* want to have CMYK specifications in stylesheets, unless your > stylesheet is targetted at a particular make and model of printer with a > particular ink set printing on a particular weight and finish of paper. That's still a chance you have to take. I could have a dusty, ten-year-old monitor with a C:\> burnt into the top-left corner, and a 3-shade gamut. It's the same parable. Of course, printers are notorious about that, but I think that most drivers try to compesate now (but I don't like printers much, so I don't know).
Received on Monday, 1 December 1997 16:01:03 UTC