- From: Kenneth Christiansen <kenth@writeme.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 21:13:01 +0200
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- CC: www-html@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
Dave Raggett wrote: > It makes sense then to recommend that browser support wrapping after > ­ and to introduce a new tag for invisible hyphenation points > that are also invisible in downlevel browsers. What should thistag > be called? <W> doesn't seem sufficiently self evident. Some other > possibilities include <HYPHEN>, <SHY>, and <HY> I think <HY> sounds like a good idea. When you use this tag the hyphenation dictionary is ignored for the word But we also have to have a container tag to avoid hyphenation, maybe somethink like <NOHYPHEN></NOHYPHEN> > Its always good to build on proven implementation experience. > The question remains as to how to link to such dictionaries. > One idea is to use LINK e.g. > > <LINK REL=hyphenation LANG=en HREF=hyphen.dict> I think that all hyphenation dictionarys schoud have a id number, so the dictionarys only will be downloaded if it's newer than the one cached on the computer. -- KENNETH CHRISTIANSEN kenth@writeme.com
Received on Thursday, 17 April 1997 15:18:12 UTC