- From: David Perrell <davidp@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 13:58:31 -0700
- To: "Fred L. Drake" <fdrake@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
- Cc: "Gavin Nicol" <gtn@eps.inso.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
Fred L. Drake wrote: > I'm getting the impression here that there's some confusion about the > terminology; David's descriptions appear to indicate that he wants tables > as *children* of paragraphs, which the DTDs I've seen don't allow. The > *sibling* relationship is there; tables can follow paragraphs and > paragraphs can follow tables, in any combination. Table cells can have > paragraphs as children. <standing, bowing, kicking myself in the butt with both feet, then wondering if this might not be counterproductive for rejuvenating short-circuited synapses> You're right. My terminology is screwed up. I mean children. Thank you. > I don't see any reason to allow tables as children of paragraphs; > sibling relationships should suffice. I believe that tables and lists can logically be children of a paragraph. David Perrell
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 1997 16:59:33 UTC