- From: Steve Knoblock <knoblock@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 11:03:42 -0500
- To: "Carl Morris" <msftrncs@htcnet.com>, "WWW Style List" <www-style@w3.org>
Carl,
it kind of an overly intellectual point, but it is a good one. The "Netscape
Now" logo's are so common I doubt anyone thought it. The problem I see with
text/css only logo is that a logo is usually considered a graphical device
(or display type like a rebus). A CSS logo would just be text. And right now
you could not depend on fancy fonts being installed. You could only use
Comic Sans (which I like) and Verdana (which I don't). So how would a CSS
font look any different than what someone could do with <font>? We might
have to wait until CSS is further deployed before creating a CSS logo in CSS.
Steve
>Of course their point was entire textual... CSS is very broad, but
>doesn't some other people out there feel that a CSS logo done in CSS,
>while it will only work completely on CSS browsers, would be more
>worthwhile? Maybe a mixture? Remember that the "Netscape Now" logo's
>meant nothing to a text only browser... :)
>
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/ Steve Knoblock, ed., City Gallery
knoblock@worldnet.att.net
_/ City Gallery - History of Photography
http://www.webcom.com/cityg
_/ Member: National Stereoscopic Association
http://www.tisco.com/3d-web/nsa/nsa.htm
Received on Friday, 22 November 1996 11:02:26 UTC