- From: Gayle Kidder <reddik@thegroup.net>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jul 1996 23:49:23 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
Having spent my last two days evaluating all the new Netscape extensions as it relates to real end users and reading all the furious e-mail from this group, I have to say that I don't know what all the ruffling of feathers here is about. 1) The multi-column capability is an easy implementation of something a lot of people want to do. 2) The SPACING tag is something a lot of ordinary Web authors have been hacking at for a long time. 3) The new frames attributes are pretty negligible, just a little cosmetic feature that the market will play with and probably get bored with. Frames have their uses, but after the thrill's over they seem less satisfying. 3) The only real feature that affects the style group is the FONT FACE biz. And anybody who seriously tries to program an entire site with the FONT tag with this new attribute will quickly see the folly, in the face of the simpler approach of style sheets. But I can also see the real use for people who only want to code a page or two and don't want to have to learn a whole 'nother language on top of HTML. I don't think that any of the new Netscape 3.0 extensions are going to undermine all the good work that's being done on style sheets. What you have to remember is that there a lot of people out there that don't know HTML at all. Keep in mind you're 3 to 5 years ahead of the masses, and you don't even have the software to support simple HTML yet. This is not about Netscape versus Microsoft. It's about making things accessible for everybody, not just programmers. Sorry, but I just had to add my 2 cents (or pence or centimes or pesos). Gayle Kidder http://www.zoomsd.com/aboutus.html
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 1996 02:51:25 UTC