- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@stonehand.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 96 12:06:10 -0500
- To: Hakon Lie <Hakon.Lie@sophia.inria.fr>
- Cc: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@fssun09.dev.oclc.org>, www-style@w3.org
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 17:15:53 +0100 From: Hakon Lie <Hakon.Lie@sophia.inria.fr> Glenn Adams writes: > I do not believe that the other style sheet proposal for HTML (CSS), > will attract serious attention from vendors or content providers whose > primary investment in content technology or content represents a longer- > term strategy than a few months at the most. I'm like to learn more about Glenn's reasons for stating the above (of which I disagree), and I propose taking the discussion to www-style@w3.org. You asked ... For starters, the syntax and semantics of CSS (to the extent that they are specified at all), seem to encounter significant changes every few months. In contrast, DSSSL is now an ISO standard. Moreover, the proposed style features represented by CSS seem to be poorly conceived, poorly specified, and, for the most part, a recipe for incompatibility. Finally, there is little direct involvement by the vendor community in the specification, development, or deployment of CSS. Rather, it appears to be more of an academic exercise in building an experimental style system test-bed. In my opinion, the exact opposite of the above holds for DSSSL. The above should not be construed as any statement about what my company will implement and/or productize w.r.t. CSS. Indeed, we have already implemented support for some but not all of the core semantics of CSS. Actually, it is my experience in implementing this support that it will be of limited utility for even current Web content providers since it is not capable at this time of describing the presentation behavior of popular UAs. To give a quick example, try to specify the indentation and list item numbering/bullet semantics for the following in a manner consistent with current Netscape display behavior using rules not based on this particular document (disregard the fact that the following does not conform to an HTML2.0 or HTML3.0 DTD -- users don't care): <TITLE>Fun with List Items</TITLE> <OL> <LI>Substitute a long paragraph here. <TABLE> <TR> <TD><LI>Substitute a long paragraph here.</TD> <TD><LI>Substitute a long paragraph here.</TD> </TR> </TABLE> </OL> Regards, Glenn Adams
Received on Monday, 15 January 1996 12:07:37 UTC