- From: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
- Date: Sun, 11 Aug 1996 17:15:32 -0700
- To: davidp@earthlink.net
- CC: fahrner@pobox.com, www-style@w3.org
| Jon Bosak wrote: | > Does anyone care that there is already an ISO standard for font | > characteristics that addresses all of this? | | Sure. Is there somewhere I can see the parameters and corresponding | values without buying the document? Yes. ISO/IEC 9541-1:1992 Parts 1 and 2 are normative references for DSSSL (ISO/IEC 10179:1996), and the basic font parameters specified there were copied into the DSSSL standard. That document, unlike just about every other ISO standard in existence, is freely available to citizens of the U.S. because the Department of Energy obtained a government finding that our participation in the effort gives us the right to see what we paid for. You can obtain a PostScript copy of 10179 (the camera-ready copy for the ISO publication) in the files named dsssl96f.ps.Z and dsssl96b.ps.Z at ftp.ornl.gov in the directory /pub/sgml/wg8/dsssl. An earlier and almost identical committee draft of the same document is available online at http://occam.sjf.novell.com:8080/dsssl/dsssl96/ The best places to look for the values relating to fonts are under the descriptions of the "paragraph flow object class" and the "character flow object class". I put the same information into an even earlier document, the dsssl-o application profile, where the font characteristics can be found in the tables of characteristics for the paragraph and character flow object classes. A somewhat crufty copy of that document is available over the Web at http://occam.sjf.novell.com:8080/docs/dsssl-o/do951212.htm and a nice, legal HTML 3.2 copy is obtainable by ftp from sunsite.unc.edu in the directory /pub/sun-info/standards/dsssl/dssslo (get do951212.zip). | I suppose this means I'm going to have to patch my 700+ fonts for | compliance. Darn. Well, you've had four years to pressure the font vendors into complying with the standard. If you don't make it clear that this is a requirement, why should they bother? Jon
Received on Sunday, 11 August 1996 20:17:26 UTC