- From: Steven Grimm <koreth@hyperion.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 12:18:11 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
>The intention is that color names are entered as keywords without >quotes. The reasoning behind this is, that, presumably, the number of >color names is small, so they can be entered in the parser's hash >table. I think that's going to prove confusing to lots of people, since it's inconsistent with HTML (or at least, HTML as widely implemented.) In an HTML document, I can write <img src=foo.gif> or <img src="foo.gif"> and they'll be interpreted the same way. That's the expectation people will have of the style sheet syntax, it seems to me. >For inline images, there is currently only text-line (provisional >name). We forgot to specify that `border' applies to included material >as well. This should be fixed. Am I correct in assuming that it's intended to be used like this? (a) img : border-style = none If so, I don't like the "normal" value of border-style, since what's "normal" is context-sensitive. Maybe "minimal" instead? In any case, I don't have a problem with it being supported under level 2; my guess is that most browser writers, when they add stylesheets to their browsers, will do all of level 1 and much of level 2. >Btw. is a line break allowed before/after an image? Unless it's in a <p nowrap>, I'd say yes. (BTW, am I correct in thinking that there's no nowrap attribute for anything but paragraphs in HTML 3?) -Steve
Received on Monday, 18 September 1995 15:18:24 UTC