- From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 11:22:30 -0800 (PST)
- To: Hakon Lie <Hakon.Lie@sophia.inria.fr>
- Cc: Joe English <joe@trystero.art.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 10 Nov 1995, Hakon Lie wrote: > > > - the STYLE attribute mixes presentational information into the > > > structure of the docuement. This is just what style sheets try to > > > avoid, and the attribute is therefore counter-productive. > > > > I would think that a stronger argument against it > > is that it would tie HTML to a single stylesheet notation. > > Or is this stuff considered far enough past the ``experimental'' > > stage that supporting different notations is no longer an issue? > > No, we need to support different notations. The idea is to declare the > notation somewhere, perhaps in a STYLE element in the header or as an > attribute to BODY. While it wouldn't tie HTML to a single style notation, it would tie a particular HTML document to a single style notation. How bad it that? Certainly not worse than the current situation.... Brian --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/
Received on Friday, 10 November 1995 15:02:21 UTC