Re: Smil 3.0 validation error using metadata element from Vandermillen, Michael on 2011-10-26 (www-smil@w3.org from October to December 2011)

From: Vandermillen, Michael <michael_vandermillen@harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:42:24 +0000
To: "www-smil@w3.org" <www-smil@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BB6CDB9EE11E114DAC7F184E6F9B431F01B63C@ENTWEXMB0000003.university.harvard.edu>

Hello,
I have a follow up question on this issue. So would it be best practice to simply include the RDF in the metadata element and not declare the smil doctype, as in the examples? Is it necessary to do the additional work to extend the language profile to define RDF?

Thanks-
Michael Vandermillen

Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:43:54 UTC