Re: Is this really XHTML+SMIL?

I've read the w3 spec, and can find no complete examples in it that clarify the structure. All of its code lacks the t: or smil: prefix on elements that I've seen in other examples that claim to be XHTML+SMIL, but don't look any different than Microsoft's HTML+TIME examples.

And several links on the w3 site point to Microsoft's HTML+TIME documentation, but refer to it as XHTML+SMIL, hence my confusion. 

  1- For XHTLM+SMIL please refer to the XHTML+SMIL Profile, W3C Note 31 January 2002
  http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-XHTMLplusSMIL-20020131/ 

  2- For HTML+TIME.refer to the Microsoft site.