Re: Is this really XHTML+SMIL?

Peter,


1- For XHTLM+SMIL please refer to the XHTML+SMIL Profile, W3C Note 31 January 2002
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-XHTMLplusSMIL-20020131/ 

2- For HTML+TIME.refer to the Microsoft site.


----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Peter Sheerin 
  To: www-smil@w3.org 
  Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:55 AM
  Subject: Is this really XHTML+SMIL?


  I'm experimenting with this new spec, and haven't found any good examples I trust. The ones I based my first attempt on are from the Microsoft site, and I'm worried that what I think is XHTML+SMIL may actually be HTML+TIME.

  http://www.petesguide.com/CADcruise/template3.html


  Can anyone tell me if that page is proprietary MS junk, or if it actually conforms to the official w3c spec?

  This business about <t:seq> has me confused and suspicious, and the page doesn't validate at all.